"}}},{"rowIdx":203,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Can you explain Steps?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"After the gingiva is opened, the basic implant bed preparation begins with preparation of the alveolar ridge (Step 1) and marking of the implantation site with a Round Bur or a Needle Drill (Step 2). The implant bed is then prepared with Pilot Drills and Twist Drills (Steps 3 – 7), according to the endosteal implant diameter chosen in the preoperative planning (see Chapter 3)."}}},{"rowIdx":204,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Why is Pin Diameter important in implant procedures?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Article No.	Templatefixationpin	Pin Diameter (mm)	Sleeve type
034.298		Q2.8/2.8	2.8 mm T-sleeve 034.055V4 034.052V4
034.285		5/2.8	5 mm T-sleeve 034.053V4 034.299V4 034.050V4
034.286		5/3.2
034.287		5/3.5
034.288		5/3.7
034.289		5/4.2

"}}},{"rowIdx":205,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Can you explain Remove?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"Remove the Ratchet while holding the Adapter at the bottom, and then detach the Adapter-Loxim® assembly."}}},{"rowIdx":206,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Why is Service Instrument important in implant procedures?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"The Ratchet is supplied with a Service Instrument, which is used to loosen or tighten the retaining screw."}}},{"rowIdx":207,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"When do we use Start?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"Always make sure to use the correct Drill Handle cylinder $(+1m m$ (one dot) or $+3\\mathsf{m m}$ (3 dots) and the corresponding drill length (short, medium, or long) as indicated in the surgical protocol. Start drilling only after fully inserting the drill into the cylinder of the Drill Handles."}}},{"rowIdx":208,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Why is Sigma important in implant procedures?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"Example: scale 1.1:1 $\\mathbf{\\Sigma}=\\mathbf{\\Sigma}$ reference sphere $\\mathcal{O}5.5\\mathsf{m m}$"}}},{"rowIdx":209,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Esthetic Zone?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"ѹ Volume 1: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Single-Tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 2: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Partially Dentate Patients ѹ Volume 3: Implant Placement in Post-Extraction Sites – Treatment Options ѹ Volume 4: Loading Protocols in Implant Dentistry – Edentulous Patients ѹ Volume 5: Sinus Floor Elevation Procedures ѹ Volume 6: Extended Edentulous Spaces in the Esthetic Zone ѹ Volume 7: Ridge Augmentation Procedures in Implant Patients – A Staged Approach ѹ Volume 8: Biological and Hardware Complications in Implant Dentistry ѹ Volume 9: Implant Therapy in the Geriatric Patient ѹ Volume 10: Implant Therapy in the Esthetic Zone – Current Treatment Modalities and Materials for Single-tooth Replacements ѹ Volume 11: Digital Workflows in Implant Dentistry"}}},{"rowIdx":210,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is the purpose of Surgical User Guide?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"For more information, please refer to Straumann® Single-patient Instruments, Surgical User Guide (702173/en)."}}},{"rowIdx":211,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"How is Delivered used in the Straumann® system?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"The Straumann® Drill Stop provides precise control over drilling depth during implant bed preparation for the placement of Straumann® dental implants. Delivered in sterile sets, the Drill Stops are ready to use. The Straumann® Drill Stop is designed for single-patient use only and must be used in conjunction with the single-patient drills specifically designed for them."}}},{"rowIdx":212,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Alignment Pin Twist Drill?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Steps	Instrumentation
1.Basic implantbedpreparation Ridge preparation	Needle Drill
Twist drilling	Round Bur Pilot Twist Drill PRO ( 2.2 mm) Alignment Pin Twist Drill PRO (Q2.8 mm) Depth Gauge
	Twist Drill PRO ( 3.5 mm) Depth Gauge Twist Drill PRO ( 4.2 mm) Depth Gauge
2.Fine implantbed preparation
Profile drilling	SP ProfileDrill	BL/NNC Profile Drill
Tapping	S/SP Tap	BL/NNC Tap

"}}},{"rowIdx":213,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"How is Round Bur Pilot Twist Drill used in the Straumann® system?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Steps	Instrumentation
1.Basic implantbedpreparation Ridge preparation	Needle Drill
Twist drilling	Round Bur Pilot Twist Drill PRO ( 2.2 mm) Alignment Pin Twist Drill PRO (Q2.8 mm) Depth Gauge
	Twist Drill PRO ( 3.5 mm) Depth Gauge Twist Drill PRO ( 4.2 mm) Depth Gauge
2.Fine implantbed preparation
Profile drilling	SP ProfileDrill	BL/NNC Profile Drill
Tapping	S/SP Tap	BL/NNC Tap

"}}},{"rowIdx":214,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What are the key considerations for Image?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Art. No.	Image	Article
026.0147		Drill handle,2.2 mm,1 mm/3 mm
026.0148	028	Drill handle, 2.8 mm,1 mm/3 mm
026.0149	032	Drill handle, 3.2 mm,1 mm/3 mm
026.0150	03.5	Drill handle,3.5 mm, 1 mm/3 mm
026.0151		Drill handle, 3.7 mm,1 mm/3 mm
026.0152	042	Drill handle, 4.2 mm, 1 mm/3 mm

"}}},{"rowIdx":215,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Why is Twist important in implant procedures?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Steps	Instrumentation
1.Basic implantbedpreparation Ridge preparation	Needle Drill
Twist drilling	Round Bur Pilot Twist Drill PRO ( 2.2 mm) Alignment Pin Twist Drill PRO (Q2.8 mm) Depth Gauge
	Twist Drill PRO ( 3.5 mm) Depth Gauge Twist Drill PRO ( 4.2 mm) Depth Gauge
2.Fine implantbed preparation
Profile drilling	SP ProfileDrill	BL/NNC Profile Drill
Tapping	S/SP Tap	BL/NNC Tap

"}}},{"rowIdx":216,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Why is Implants important in implant procedures?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Situation	Healing phase
	SLActive	SLA
·Good bone quality and adequate bone quantity · lmplants with a diameter of 4.1 mm or 4.8 mm and a Straumann SLActive/SLA surface length of ≥ 8 mm	At least 3-4 weeks	At least 6 weeks
·Cancellous bone quality · lmplants with a diameter of 2.9 mm · lmplants with a diameter of 3.3 mm ·Implants with a Straumann SLActive?/SLAsurface length of 6 mm	At least 8 weeks	At least 12 weeks
·Straumann° Standard Plus Short Implant	10-12 weeks	n.a.
· Straumann SLActive/SLA°surface is not completely in contact with the bone · Bone augmentation measures* are necessary	Healing phase corresponding to the situation

"}}},{"rowIdx":217,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Why is Suppl important in implant procedures?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30)  2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11  3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212  4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737  5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21  6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434  7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551  8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486  9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272  10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). \"Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356.  11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). \"Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760.  12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). \"10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface.\" Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124.  13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). \"Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961.  14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). \"Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744.  15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115.  16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450  17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86"}}},{"rowIdx":218,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Why is Benefits important in implant procedures?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Features		Benefits
Snap-in mounting...	... for easy handling without counter-maneuvering
Blue color...	.. for high visibility
Compact dimensions ..		.. for easy access
Height markings ..	.. for correct implant placement
Pre-determined breaking		.. avoids bone overcompression
point...

"}}},{"rowIdx":219,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is the purpose of Compact?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Features		Benefits
Snap-in mounting...	... for easy handling without counter-maneuvering
Blue color...	.. for high visibility
Compact dimensions ..		.. for easy access
Height markings ..	.. for correct implant placement
Pre-determined breaking		.. avoids bone overcompression
point...

"}}},{"rowIdx":220,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What are the key considerations for Standard Plus Implant?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1. Pilot Twist Drill PRO, $\\ensuremath{\\mathcal{O}}2.2\\ensuremath{\\mathrm{mm}}$ 2. Alignment Pin, $\\mathcal{O}2.2\\mathsf{m m}$ 3. Twist Drill PRO, $\\ensuremath{\\mathcal{O}}2.8\\ensuremath{\\mathrm{mm}}$ 4. Twist Drill PRO, $\\mathcal{O}3.5\\mathsf{m m}$ 5. Twist Drill PRO, $\\varnothing4.2{\\mathsf{m m}}$ 6. \u0007Straumann® Standard Plus Implant, $\\mathcal{\\ K}4.1$ RN, length $\\boldsymbol{10}\\boldsymbol{\\mathrm{mm}}$ 7. \u0007Straumann® Bone Level ­Implant, $\\mathcal{O}4.1$ RC, length $\\boldsymbol{10}\\boldsymbol{\\mathrm{mm}}$"}}},{"rowIdx":221,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Can you explain Arch Implant?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30)  2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11  3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212  4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737  5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21  6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434  7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551  8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486  9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272  10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). \"Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356.  11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). \"Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760.  12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). \"10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface.\" Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124.  13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). \"Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961.  14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). \"Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744.  15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115.  16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450  17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86"}}},{"rowIdx":222,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"When do we use Dent Res?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30)  2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11  3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212  4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737  5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21  6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434  7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551  8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486  9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272  10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). \"Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356.  11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). \"Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760.  12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). \"10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface.\" Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124.  13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). \"Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961.  14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). \"Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744.  15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115.  16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450  17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86"}}},{"rowIdx":223,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is the purpose of Taking?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"\\* \u0007Taking into consideration all implant-related anatomical structures (e.g. mandibular canal, maxillary sinus, etc.)"}}},{"rowIdx":224,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is the purpose of Cleaning?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"6.1\tSurgical instruments 46 6.2\tOsteotomes 52 6.3\tCleaning and care of instruments\b 54"}}},{"rowIdx":225,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"How is Guided used in the Straumann® system?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"Note: Guided handles are compatible up to $\\varnothing4.2{\\mathsf{m m}}$ . For drills with $\\varnothing4.7\\mathsf{m m}$ and larger remove the template for freehand drilling."}}},{"rowIdx":226,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Regular?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

List of abbreviations
SCS =	Screw Carrying System
HDD =	Horizontal Defect Dimension
NNC =	Narrow Neck CrossFit connection (3.5 mm)
RN =	Regular Neck (4.8 mm)
WN =	Wide Neck (6.5 mm)
NC	Narrow CrossFit? connection (for Bone Level lmplants)
RC	Regular CrossFit? connection (for Bone Level lmplants)
S	Standard
SP	Standard Plus
BL	Bone Level
SPS	Standard Plus Short

"}}},{"rowIdx":227,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is the purpose of Pilot Drill?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Article	Art. no.	Dimensions
Pilot Drill 1 044.763	044.763	2.2 mm, extra short
Pilot Twist Drill PRO	044.783	044.783*	2.2 mm, short
Pilot Drill 1	044.21002.2	044.210**	2.2 mm, short
Pilot Twist Drill PRO	044.785	044.785*	2.2 mm, long
Pilot Drill 1	044.21102.2	044.211**	2.2 mm, long
Twist Drill PRO	044.765	044.765	3.5 mm, extra short
Twist Drill PRO	044.787	044.787*	2.8 mm, short
Pilot Drill 2	044.21402.8	044.214**	2.8 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO	044.789	044.789*	2.8 mm, long
Pilot Drill 2	044.21502.8	044.215**	2.8 mm, long
Twist Drill PRO	044.765	044.765	3.5 mm, extra short
Twist Drill PRO	044.791	044.791*
Twist Drill PRO	044.25003.5	044.250**	3.5 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO	044.793川		3.5 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO		044.793*	3.5 mm, long
Twist Drill PRO	044.25103.5	044.251**	3.5 mm, long
	044./66 三	044.766	4.2 mm, extra short
Twist Drill PRO	044.795 三	044.795*	4.2 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO	044.25404.2 三	044.254**	4.2 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO	044.797 C	044.797*	4.2 mm, long
Twist Drill PRO	044.25504.2	044.255**	4.2 mm, long

"}}},{"rowIdx":228,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Connection?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Connection	Recommended torque
Basal screw	35 Ncm
Mucosa cylinder	35 Ncm
Bone graft abutment	15 Ncm

"}}},{"rowIdx":229,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Important?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"7.1\t \u0007Related documentation 55 7.2\t Important guidelines 56"}}},{"rowIdx":230,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Can you explain Module?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Art. No.	Picture	Article
BModule
041.776		Straumann Modular Cassette, B Module
041.780	88888800000	B Module, Guided Fully Tapered Tray
034.010	034.010	Mucosa Punch 3.4 mm, 30 mm, guided
034.011	034.011	Mucosa Punch 4.0 mm,30 mm, guided
034.012	034.012	Mucosa Punch 4.7 mm, 30 mm, guided
034.215	034.215 00001	Milling Cutter,2.8 mm, 32.5 mm, guided
034.415	034.415 001	Milling Cutter, 3.5 mm, 32.5 mm, guided
034.615		Milling Cutter,4.2 mm, 32.5 mm, guided
066.1301	T： 066.1301 0211三	Pilot VeloDrillM, guided, 2.2mm sht
066.1302	06.1302 02811	VeloDrillM, guided, 2.8 mm, short, stainless steel
066.1303		VloDrillm guided, 3.2 mm, short, stainless steel
066.1304		VeloDrill, guided, 3.5 mm, short, stainless steel
066.1305		VeloDrillM, guided, 3.7mm, short, stainless steel
066.1306		VeloDrill, guided,4.2 mm, short, stainless steel
066.1307		VeloDrillM, guided, 4.7mm, short, stainless steel
066.1308		VeloDrillM, guided, 5.2, short, stainless steel
066.1309		VeloDrill, guided,6.2, short, stainless seel
066.1501	A 066.50 221110	Pilot VeloDrillM,guided,2.2 mm, medium, stainless steel
066.1502		VeloDrillM, guided, 2.8 mm, medium, stainless steel
066.1503	电 06.60 032	VeloDrilliM, guided, 3.2 mm, medium, stainless steel
066.1504		VeloDrill, guided, 3.5 mm, medium, stainless steel
066.1505	B 86.1505 37 11	VeloDrillm, guided, 3.7 mm, medium, stainless steel
066.1506		VeloDrilm guided, 4.2 mm, medium, stanless steel
066.1701	T066170 021	Pilot VeloDrillM, guided, 2.2 mm, long.stainless steel
066.1702	皖E-066-702 021三	VeloDrillM, guided, 2.8 mm, long, stainless steel
066.1703		VeloDrill, guided, 3.2 mm, long, stainless steel
066.1704		VeloDrillM, guided, 3.5 mm, long, stainless steel
066.1705		VeloDrilm,guided,3.7mm, long, stainless sl
066.1706		VeloDrillM, guided, 4.2 mm, long, stainless steel
066.1707		VeloDrillM, guided, 4.7mm, long, stainless steel

"}}},{"rowIdx":231,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is the purpose of Evaluation?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30)  2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11  3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212  4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737  5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21  6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434  7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551  8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486  9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272  10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). \"Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356.  11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). \"Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760.  12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). \"10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface.\" Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124.  13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). \"Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961.  14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). \"Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744.  15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115.  16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450  17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86"}}},{"rowIdx":232,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Standard Implants?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"ѹ Straumann® Standard Plus and Bone Level Implants require profile drilling with specific instruments. This is independent of the bone class. Due to the unflared neck portion, Standard Plus $\\varnothing4.8\\mathsf{m m}$ RN Implants are inserted without profile drilling. ѹ Straumann® Standard Implants are inserted without profile drilling."}}},{"rowIdx":233,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is the purpose of Article?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Article	Art. no.	Dimensions
Pilot Drill 1 044.763	044.763	2.2 mm, extra short
Pilot Twist Drill PRO	044.783	044.783*	2.2 mm, short
Pilot Drill 1	044.21002.2	044.210**	2.2 mm, short
Pilot Twist Drill PRO	044.785	044.785*	2.2 mm, long
Pilot Drill 1	044.21102.2	044.211**	2.2 mm, long
Twist Drill PRO	044.765	044.765	3.5 mm, extra short
Twist Drill PRO	044.787	044.787*	2.8 mm, short
Pilot Drill 2	044.21402.8	044.214**	2.8 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO	044.789	044.789*	2.8 mm, long
Pilot Drill 2	044.21502.8	044.215**	2.8 mm, long
Twist Drill PRO	044.765	044.765	3.5 mm, extra short
Twist Drill PRO	044.791	044.791*
Twist Drill PRO	044.25003.5	044.250**	3.5 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO	044.793川		3.5 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO		044.793*	3.5 mm, long
Twist Drill PRO	044.25103.5	044.251**	3.5 mm, long
	044./66 三	044.766	4.2 mm, extra short
Twist Drill PRO	044.795 三	044.795*	4.2 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO	044.25404.2 三	044.254**	4.2 mm, short
Twist Drill PRO	044.797 C	044.797*	4.2 mm, long
Twist Drill PRO	044.25504.2	044.255**	4.2 mm, long

"}}},{"rowIdx":234,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What are the key considerations for Biomed?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30)  2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11  3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212  4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737  5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21  6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434  7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551  8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486  9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272  10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). \"Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356.  11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). \"Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760.  12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). \"10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface.\" Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124.  13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). \"Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961.  14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). \"Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744.  15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115.  16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450  17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86"}}},{"rowIdx":235,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What are the key considerations for Survival?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30)  2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11  3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212  4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737  5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21  6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434  7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551  8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486  9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272  10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). \"Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356.  11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). \"Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760.  12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). \"10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface.\" Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124.  13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). \"Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961.  14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). \"Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744.  15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115.  16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450  17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86"}}},{"rowIdx":236,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Standard?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"Please note that Standard plus $4\\mathsf{m m}$ Implants and NNC Implants require the corresponding diameter BL Taps."}}},{"rowIdx":237,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Simultaneously?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"Simultaneously pull down the implant carrier and lift the implant out of the implant carrier (keep your arms steady)."}}},{"rowIdx":238,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"How is Dental used in the Straumann® system?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Straumann? Dental lImplant System - parallel-walled endosteal design
TissueLevel lmplants	Bone Level Implants
S	SP NNC		SPS	BL
Straumann? Standard Implant (S)	Straumann? Standard Plus Implant (SP)	Straumann?Standard PlusNarrowNeck CrossFitImplant (NNC)	Straumann? Standard Plus Short Implant (SPS)	Straumann? Bone Level Implant (BL)

"}}},{"rowIdx":239,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"How is Basal used in the Straumann® system?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"

Connection	Recommended torque
Basal screw	35 Ncm
Mucosa cylinder	35 Ncm
Bone graft abutment	15 Ncm

"}}},{"rowIdx":240,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"How is Place used in the Straumann® system?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"For situations in which any removal force is to be avoided, a release aid for the Loxim® can be used. Place the release aid onto the implant shoulder and hold it in place while detaching the Adapter with the Loxim®."}}},{"rowIdx":241,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Periodontol?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30)  2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11  3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212  4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737  5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21  6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434  7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551  8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486  9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272  10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). \"Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356.  11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). \"Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760.  12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). \"10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface.\" Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124.  13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). \"Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961.  14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). \"Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744.  15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115.  16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450  17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86"}}},{"rowIdx":242,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"When do we use The Surgical Template?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"The Surgical Template must allow for proper irrigation of the surgical site. Windows may also be included in the Surgical Template. For a correct fit of the handle cylinder in the T-sleeve, remove additional material around the T-sleeve."}}},{"rowIdx":243,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What are the key considerations for International Journal?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30)  2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11  3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212  4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737  5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21  6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434  7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551  8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486  9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272  10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). \"Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356.  11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). \"Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760.  12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). \"10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface.\" Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124.  13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). \"Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961.  14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). \"Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744.  15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115.  16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450  17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86"}}},{"rowIdx":244,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"How is The Guided Adapter used in the Straumann® system?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"The Guided Adapter must be fully engaged with the Loxim® Transfer Piece to ensure depth control."}}},{"rowIdx":245,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"Why is The Implant Distance Indicators important in implant procedures?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"The disks of the Implant Distance Indicators display the shoulder diameters of Straumann® implants. The Implant Distance Indicators can be used to check the available space before the start of treatment or intraoperatively to mark the desired implant site."}}},{"rowIdx":246,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What is Implant Distance Indicators?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"The disks of the Implant Distance Indicators display the shoulder diameters of Straumann® implants. The Implant Distance Indicators can be used to check the available space before the start of treatment or intraoperatively to mark the desired implant site."}}},{"rowIdx":247,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What are the key considerations for The Holding Key?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"The Holding Key can be used to stabilize the Ratchet."}}},{"rowIdx":248,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"What are the key considerations for Cabrera?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"1 Bernhard N et al. (2009): The Binary TiZr Alloy – A newly developed Ti Alloy for use in dental implants; Forum Implantologicum 5(30)  2 Medvedev et al. (2016): Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-15Zr alloy used as dental implant material; J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016 Sep; 62:384-98. doi: 10.1016/j. jmbbm.2016.05.008. epub 2016 May 11  3 Gottlow J et al. (2012): Evaluation of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig; Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14 Suppl. 1:e204-e212  4 Thoma et al. (2011): Tissue integration of a new Titanium-Zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine; J. Periodontol. 2011 Oct; 82(10):1453-61. doi 10.1902/jop.2010.100737  5 Wen et al. (2014): The osseointegration behavior of Titanium-Zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits; Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul; 25(7):819-25. doi: 10.1111/clr.12141. epub 2013 Feb 21  6 Nelson K (2016): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with chemically modified and conventional SLA implants: a clinical clarification; J Oral Rehabil; 43: 871–872. doi:10.1111/joor.12434  7 Heberer S et al. (2011): Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study; Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22, 2011; 546-551  8 Cabrera-Domínguez JJ et al. Clinical performance of titanium-zirconium implants with a hydrophilic surface in patients with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus: 2-year results from a prospective case-control clinical study Clin Oral Investig 2020 Jul;24(7):2477-2486  9 Alsahhap A et al. Survival of Titanium-Zirconium and Titanium Dental Implants in Cigarette-smokers and Never-smokers: A 5-Year Follow-upChin J Dent Res. 2019;22(4):265-272  10 Lang, N. P., G. E. Salvi, G. Huynh-Ba, S. Ivanovski, N. Donos and D. D. Bosshardt (2011). \"Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4): 349-356.  11 Oates, T. W., P. Valderrama, M. Bischof, R. Nedir, A. Jones, J. Simpson, H. Toutenburg and D. L. Cochran (2007). \"Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22(5): 755-760.  12 Nicolau, P., F. Guerra, R. Reis, T. Krafft, K. Benz and J. Jackowski (2019). \"10-year outcomes with immediate and early loaded implants with a chemically modified SLA surface.\" Quintessence Int 50(2): 114-124.  13 Reis, R., P. Nicolau, N. Calha, A. Messias and F. Guerra (2019). \"Immediate versus early loading protocols of titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter implants for mandibular overdentures in edentulous patients: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial.\" Clin Oral Implants Res 30(10): 953-961.  14 Eckert, S. E., G. Hueler, N. Sandler, R. Elkattah and D. C. McNeil (2019). \"Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Retained Prosthesis: Clinical Analysis When Using a Moderate Insertion Torque.\" Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(3): 737–744.  15 Kuchler U, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Siewczyk M, Gruber R, Maestre L, Buser D. Development of Implant Stability Quotient values of implants placed with simultaneous sinus floor elevation – results of a prospective study with 109 implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 28, 2017, 109–115.  16 El Chaar E, Zhang L, Zhou Y, et al. Osseointegration of Superhydrophilic Implants Placed in Defect Grafted Bones. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Mar/Apr2019, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p443-450  17 Schwarz, F., et al., Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive®) and conventional SLA® titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs. J Clin.Periodontol. 34.1 (2007): 78–86"}}},{"rowIdx":249,"cells":{"instruction":{"kind":"string","value":"How is Distance Indicator used in the Straumann® system?"},"response":{"kind":"string","value":"Mark the implantation site determined during the implant position planning with the $\\varnothing1.4\\mathsf{m m}$ Round Bur or the $\\mathcal{O}1.6$ Needle Drill. The Implant Distance Indicator can be used for this purpose. If the Distance Indicator is used together with the Needle Drill to mark the implant position, make sure not to drill more than $3\\mathsf{m m}$ in order to avoid any collision between the Needle Drill and the Distance Indicator."}}}],"truncated":false,"partial":false},"paginationData":{"pageIndex":2,"numItemsPerPage":100,"numTotalItems":250,"offset":200,"length":100}},"jwt":"eyJhbGciOiJFZERTQSJ9.eyJyZWFkIjp0cnVlLCJwZXJtaXNzaW9ucyI6eyJyZXBvLmNvbnRlbnQucmVhZCI6dHJ1ZX0sImlhdCI6MTc1NzY0MTI0OSwic3ViIjoiL2RhdGFzZXRzL0JpcmRpZUJ5dGUxMDI0L2RlbnRhbF9pbXBsYW50X3N0cmF1bWFubiIsImV4cCI6MTc1NzY0NDg0OSwiaXNzIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9odWdnaW5nZmFjZS5jbyJ9.sr0a62yENpsNwiXRNXiUz7KYUwhsPG_tezaNFW7zdJ1KA57k_R__gyMlpiPsULGk37oIOZlJTC6COFw-BVKWDA","displayUrls":true},"discussionsStats":{"closed":0,"open":0,"total":0},"fullWidth":true,"hasGatedAccess":true,"hasFullAccess":true,"isEmbedded":false,"savedQueries":{"community":[],"user":[]}}">